In the first litigated ADA Title II case involving unnecessary segregation in sheltered workshops, the plaintiffs and the United States submitted initial and rebuttal reports from twenty-four experts, while the State produced initial and rebuttal reports from eight retained experts and eight state officials. The plaintiffs’ reports covered a broad range of issues, including:
Tara Asai: Oregon Is Not Implementing its Employment First Policy
Rob Cimera: Cost of Supported Employment and Sheltered Workshops
Ann Coffey: Oregon’s Recent Efforts to Expand Supported Employment Are Not Working
Andrew Houtenville: Supported Employment and the Oregon Economy
Paula Johnson: Oregon Has Failed to Provide Employment Opportunities for Youth in Transition
Richard Luecking: Supported Employment Providers in Oregon
David Mank: Systemic Overview of Supported Employment and DD Service Systems
Debra McLean: Oregon Historically Has Failed to Expand Supported Employment
Ruby Moore: Capacity of Supported Employment Providers in Oregon
Mary Morningstar: Transition Services for Youth in Oregon’s School System
Laura Owens: National Standards on Supported Employment
Lyn Rucker: Expanding Supported Employment Does Not Constitute a Fundamental Alteration
Lynnae Ruttledge: Systemic Overview of Supported Employment and VR Service Systems
Jo-Ann Sowers: Oregon Does Not Have an Effectively Working Olmstead Plan
Paul Wehman: Professional Literature on Supported Employment